cameronpat.bsky.social
biostatistician @ University of Melbourne Statistical Consulting Centre. enjoyer of multiple imputation, RCTs, and DAGs. always graph your data. also runs, bikes, hikes, etc. he/him #BiInSci 🏳️🌈 https://cameronpatrick.com/
👤 Joined on 01 October 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@cameronpat.bsky.socialNot Found
sven.blacksky.app
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
fireytopaz.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
mogli01.bsky.social
straighttalk317.bsky.social
purplepingers.bsky.social
scotgirl72.bsky.social
thelibbojack.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
esghound.com
artdecade.bsky.social
Not Found
aquariansimmer.bsky.social
Not Found
neilhimself.neilgaiman.com
Not Found
kellyknowles.art
IME qual methodological critique, such as it is, tends to centre on broadly ethical and political questions about e.g. how methods can render people or communities invisible, how they can be reductive of complex experience etc. (Important issues ofc but I think different to quant methods critique).
Show PostI think the short answer is that there isn't such a community, at least not in the same way. There's a lot of reasons for that but one of them IMO is that a tight focus on the link between methods and results would for many qual people have too much the whiff of positivism (I think this is bad btw).
Show PostIt has come to my attention that many people are unaware that the person who figured out that the private key was 4 was a Something Awful forums goon: forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.p...
Show PostStar Wars was entirely made in the editing booth and has fuck all in common with Lucas's script.
Show Post