If you have a university, which, as Cambridge has consistently done, uses legal threats and attacks whistleblowers, that also needs to be scrutinised (and increases the amount of coverage that is needed to get action):

Show Post

If you have someone who is telling tall tales about their personal life and in a memoir in academia (an activity that cannot operate without trust) then they can't stay there, ultimately. Some level of coverage of that is appropriate.

Show Post

There are plenty. If they questioned his marking he played the race card. He was consistently late (when he turned up) and was known for ‘teaching’ absolute tosh. A fraud and a charlatan.

Show Post

Never saw any articles written about how his students felt about him. 🤔

Show Post

Because he was Black and professed to hold liberal-left opinions, so could play the race card in life and others play it on his behalf posthumously. It is still sad when any fraudster commits suicide after being found out, but also cowardly and irresponsible to abandon his young children like this.

Show Post