It is not carrying water for Republicans to point out that Democratic campaigns almost universally behave in the same way as elder scam rings.

Show Post

It’s an expensive signal that I use to confirm you’ve actually read your own paper. I have no issue with this insistence.

Show Post

I see a million academic papers and companies conflate this all the time in the realm of remote sensing and Earth observation: just because you can predict it, doesn’t mean that the mechanistic explanation is sound. Accordingly, inference based on the assumption is going to be on shaky ground.

Show Post

When examining humans, an interpretation of the results of this test assumes X,Y,Z about humans, even though X,Y,Z are not stated. And if X,Y,Z don't hold then a different interpretation is required. So it's also an issue of weak specification of theory in Psychology.

Show Post

When we saw this on tv, I almost lost my mind

Show Post