publicsectornrg.bsky.social
Humanist, climate hawk, YIMBY, Outdoor Recreation, American, student of cognitive biases, skier, surfer, Californian
👤 Joined on 04 August 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@publicsectornrg.bsky.socialseditionist.bsky.social
Not Found
ediz1975.bsky.social
afineblogger.bsky.social
criticalurbanism.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
meidastouch.com
Not Found
ronfilipkowski.bsky.social
daveweigel.bsky.social
toasty.cx
senrab.bsky.social
brendelbored.bsky.social
foodlover24.bsky.social
confusedlib.bsky.social
usstockpros.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Reporters should stop quoting "experts" who reject the well-documented empirical evidence about housing markets out of an ideological distaste for market rate development.
Show PostAnd it's very much Huffman just being sneaky because he agrees with you that he wants to kill the bill, but won't just say it.
Show PostThe odds of it passing are low already. (Everywhere I look, left & right, I see people retreating into their tribal bubbles.) But if it doesn't pass, there is not some better bill, free of uncomfortable tradeoffs, over the horizon. There just isn't. People who tell you otherwise are misleading you.
Show PostI would add, @realjaredhuffman.bsky.social knows all this. The leaders of the green groups opposing this bill know all this. They know the idea of a tradeoff-free bill just over the horizon is an illusion. It's false. When they say it, they are misleading their members, their voters.
Show PostAnd, I would say, it's false in a way that's fairly obvious to anyone who knows how Congress works, so it's hard for me not to view it, at least coming from veteran NGO leaders, as *deliberately* misleading, in a way I find somewhat infuriating. Let's walk through the logic.
Show Post