Say "trans athletes in sports are fair" like you've got thirty goddamn years of history standing at your back. Say "trans athletes in sports are safe" like you've got ever major medical organization in the country publishing papers affirming your position whole-heartedly.

Show Post

"Trans women in sports are safe. Trans kids in sports are safe. Men deciding who's a 'real' woman - or for that matter, a 'real' girl - is blatantly unsafe and f---ing creepy." Reject the premise full-throat. Call out the inevitable outcome of their position. Call the monsters, monsters.

Show Post

I keep seeing (what I hope are well-intentioned) moderates and allies responding to "it is inherently unfair for biological males to play in women's sports" to open their retort with "be that as it may" or "what actual solution do you propose" or the like. No, dammit! Reject the premise entirely!

Show Post

Oh, and if you need to map this to the Greater Goings On: This is literally why "weirdos" works politically. It's a refusal to participate in the premise. The "concerns" are invalid; their intentions are malicious, and the outcomes are toxic. You don't *prove* that. You talk as if it's *proven*.

Show Post

Say "the valid medical treatment for trans people is transition" like we've already tried everything else, found the f---ing solution, and yet one idiot in an ill-fitting suit persists in proposing we go back to leeches and bloodletting because he's kind of into it. Take them unseriously.

Show Post