relatively sane representatives of this genre of "research" have caveats the size of a decent operation manual and flaws @cjferguson1111.bsky.social could drive a truck through), e.g. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC... as for "assume you want it" well, your core problem is sex ed not porn but>

Show Post

this is just malamuthian nonsense, the evidence for porn association with domestic violence (or any violence , be it strangulatory or otherwise) is on par with evidence for UFO abductions, @cjferguson1111.bsky.social demonstrated that splendidly and even UK cultural harm weirdos admit their >

Show Post

It's the first day of October, and I have a lot of events to look forward to this month!

Show Post

Been thinking about this. People say 'social contagion' like it's a bad thing. Yeah, if you put it like that. What it really is is just: people sharing information. Yes, it can increase identification. That's a feature.

Show Post

3) sometimes counter-empirical epistemology of some sort are deployed ( such as for example Clare McGlynn and Erika Rackley outright REJECTING that lack of evidence of "harmful porn influence" (a lack extensively documented by @cjferguson1111.bsky.social ) has any bearing on their argument >

Show Post