stevevladeck.bsky.social
@ksvesq.bsky.social’s husband; father of daughters; prof. @georgetownlaw.bsky.social; #SCOTUS nerd @CNN.com Bio: www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck "One First" SCOTUS newsletter: stevevladeck.com Book: https://tinyurl.com/thecourtweneed
👤 Joined on 04 May 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@stevevladeck.bsky.socialNot Found
nmcarlito.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
nixonsoldier.bsky.social
perinj.bsky.social
futureed.bsky.social
trumpsgoonsquad.bsky.social
chalala1.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
trumpster3.bsky.social
thunderbolt321.bsky.social
wiligelmus.bsky.social
Not Found
harborberries.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
You're always getting rightfully annoyed with the same bunch of people. Ignore them. They are not worth the time. The rest of us appreciate you explaining everything to us.
Show PostI'm not sure that you're reading the vibe of Steve's response accurately here. He answered your question and even shared a direct link to his article with more detailed information to help you better understand the situation. That seems like the opposite of an admonishment.
Show Post@stevevladeck.bsky.social It would seem to absolve the FCC of any requirement to *ever* complete its administrative review, making it effectively impossible to challenge.
Show Post(just kidding, obviously. I have a pretty high threshold for assholeishness, as I think we all should.)
Show Post