romanx.bsky.social
Husband, Father, Superman fan, from the Midwest. A lapsed chemist and current CISSP.
👤 Joined on 12 November 2024
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@romanx.bsky.socialhollyweirdnorth.bsky.social
projectliberal.bsky.social
neilhimself.neilgaiman.com
Not Found
underthestarz.bsky.social
brap.bsky.social
caspery.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
diaperdiplomacy-m.bsky.social
Not Found
satrina.mngirls.online
Not Found
drhello.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
bloodhoundbooks.bsky.social
jasonleader1.bsky.social
twitterreject2025.bsky.social
tallyman2023.bsky.social
leftoflenin.com
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
1. In principle, I think this is right—if you believe in "original public meaning," you have to ask what the text meant to the men who were allowed to vote for the ratifiers. 2. It is possible to do historical research into what the text meant to ordinary people. 3. SCOTUS doesn't do that research.
Show PostOther, more serious countries have actual constitutional courts
Show Postits a republican reboot of campaigning with liz cheney
Show PostSeems like these articles work mainly as pool filters for catching the exact kinds of parents children should go no contact with
Show Post