Not worth reading or considering. Putting all your eggs on responding to something rather than preventing it in the first place is ridiculous.

Show Post

This would break the illusion that SCOTUS hears a case without a preconceived outcome, but it wouid mean all circuits get to decide which current precedent should form the basis for future precedent. Then, at some point later, we can implement an amendment for term limits or something if we want it

Show Post

👏👇

Show Post

I don’t know which act you mean, and that’s really sad.

Show Post

I saw someone call this "Operation Quiet Piggy" and I can't stop laughing.

Show Post