nefarioushabits.bsky.social
Avid Book Reader. Much to learn.
👤 Joined on 17 January 2025
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@nefarioushabits.bsky.socialmartinrowson.bsky.social
donshantajr.bsky.social
dog-e-doo-doo.bsky.social
slayeragolf.bsky.social
rbreich.bsky.social
barronwtramp.bsky.social
hexhomos.bsky.social
shoredweller7.bsky.social
paulsluggoshellyjr.bsky.social
georgiablue.bsky.social
charlietotherescue.bsky.social
perfumeflogger.bsky.social
deekay2025.bsky.social
corrina.sheshed.rocks
Not Found
sassy0210.bsky.social
Not Found
allan1.bsky.social
oscar-felix.bsky.social
bindiatthebeach.bsky.social
olddudefella.bsky.social
neil076.bsky.social
canaansdad1987.bsky.social
ellohhlo.bsky.social
bluestormcomin1.bsky.social
It still made it on a slide being show to thousands at comic con, meaning that no one higher up on the production reviewed that material before it was shown publicly. So even if it was one person that didn't have an impact on the final designa, it's still an insanely bad look to have that there
Show PostThe fears I saw weren't that the artwork itself was ai generated, but that chatgpt was being used instead of consulting experts or texts for cultural research and this does very little to dissuade those fears
Show PostYeah this is very "that one GOTY saying they used it for a single placeholder texture" Even if you did only use it once for a limited thing, you guys still deserve some clowning and it isn't anyone else's fault if people have the ick. Because how does 1 use get into a presentation slide?
Show Postso, /yes/, AI was used as the slide described - as a replacement for genuine cultural consultation. we have nothing but your word it was only used for this once. the slide was completely accurate and truthful in its description of AI use, not "snuck in by some anonymous jackass" very disappointing.
Show PostJax if she wasn't a huge piece of shit.
Show Post