Companies like Anthropic and OpenAI are under scrutiny for copyright and human rights violations, unjust labor practices, unsustainable energy and water use, and the deployment of AI hacking systems. Can an academic use such a tool without breaching the Transparency and Responsibility principles?

Show Post

This means that when a university recommends a GenAI tool or even licenses it to their researchers or students (aspiring researchers), they need to show that the tool does not infringe on academic integrity principles by design. Will tools like ChatGPT and Claude pass that test? ⬇️

Show Post

In the duty of care section of the Code, universities are not only urged to make clear guidelines on how researchers can use AI in alignment with the Code but also what technologies align with it. ⬇️

Show Post

The new Dutch Code of Conduct for Research Integrity has launched and it includes new sections about AI in research. These could have big consequences for how Dutch universities adopt GenAI in research and education. www.knaw.nl/en/publicati... ⬇️

Show Post

bsky.app/profile/hype...

Show Post