tkaiser.science
Working at the intersection of clinical psych and methods: Universities of Kassel and Osnabrück More: https://linktr.ee/tkaiser_science
👤 Joined on 03 July 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@tkaiser.bsky.social@tkaiser.bsky.social → @tkaiser.sciencelucy-vi.bsky.social
Not Found
merryghouled.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
antidwatch.bsky.social
papiya04.bsky.social
Not Found
meckeringboy.bsky.social
Not Found
globalnestnews.bsky.social
globalnewsdeckhour.bsky.social
news-feed.bsky.social
Not Found
ghirtle.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
I think of rung 2 as a population/nondeterministic view and rung 3 as an individual/deterministic view. Like if X is one of multiple influences on Y and you have some individual c, on rung 2 you can't really ask whether a small increase in c's X would have lead to a small increase in Y.
Show PostWith apologies to pearl, I find it easier to explain using potential outcomes. Rung 1 depends only on the distribution P(Y), rung 2 also on the marginal distributions of the potential outcomes P(Y(0)), P(Y(1)), and rung 3 also on the joint distributions of the potential outcomes, P(Y(0),Y(1)).
Show PostGlad to see that discussions about trve kvlt metal have finally made it to bluesky, this said - as the one trve annointed gatekeeper, the usage in the OP is fine
Show PostA clusterfuck of cyber trucks
Show PostOh and congrats Eiko btw!!! Very happy for you. right call for a doctor to cross that border into a country that has so much more academic swag, picture me jealous.
Show Post