"privately-owned for profit" are you arguing that my home electricity is not a public utility

Show Post

If the content management decisions that his platforms make are first amendment protected publisher’s decisions, then he should accept the same liability for every post that appears on them as the NYT accepts for every story it runs

Show Post

Mike, genuinely: how does subpoenaing Zuck to testify before Congress violate the First Amendment? This is a wild theory and completely new to me.

Show Post

Also MSNow is a publisher and is entitled to make editorial decisions. Social media is not supposed to be a publisher, and if it starts acting like one, especially if it's obviously done to benefit certain parties, that's pure corruption and lawlessness.

Show Post

But also, a common carrier restricting specific speech is a long held except to first amendment rules. The government can't tell you what you can and can't say, they absolutely can tell you you're not allowed to discriminate on your immune to liability from its users speech platform.

Show Post