Andrei Cimpian

andreicimpian.bsky.social

14 October 2026 14:52

💖 Love these studies! We often think we're being inclusive when flagging women's gender explicitly when talking about their accomplishments (e.g., "A woman won the Nobel prize in chemistry")... but this often backfires. Free pdf: drive.google.com/file/d/1GtCF... 👇

April Bailey

ahbailey.bsky.social

14 October 2026 14:41

"Space4Women" "Girls Who Code" "WNBA"... all help to include women in male-dominated domains We asked: Does a gender-emphasis ("women") ITSELF help communicate inclusion (space IS "for women") or backfire (space is actually "for men")? 7 experiments out today in JEP:G --> doi.org/10.1037/xge0...

Shirley Wang

shirleybwang.bsky.social

12 October 2026 23:00

Congratulations to the brilliant @leilyb.bsky.social for winning the SRP EDI poster award!! Such incredible work and well-deserved recognition 🤩🥂 And congrats to @jananmost.bsky.social & all awardees 🥳 one of my favorite parts of SRP is how it celebrates & supports the work of trainees!

Leily M Behbehani

leilyb.bsky.social

12 October 2026 23:00

I had such a wonderful time at SRP 2026 @srpsychopathology.bsky.social! So much exciting and thoughtful working being done, and I feel especially grateful to have received this recognition. Thank you @shirleybwang.bsky.social for all your mentorship & support. Congrats to all the amazing presenters!

Dorsa Amir

dorsaamir.bsky.social

29 September 2026 18:06

Are people bad randomizers in general, or only in some contexts? In our new paper, now in press at Cognition, we found that 'socializing' randomization — in this case by pitting people against each other in a live game of Battleship — dramatically improved randomization behavior 👇🏼