Under current law S is immune to suit for its role in the harm caused to B. (*) because we are on Bluesky: I AM NOT SAYING ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT SEX WORK. Falsely accusing someone of being a prostitute is defamation per se, as in: you don’t need to prove damage. It’s presumptively damaging.

Show Post

I don't understand the notion of free speech absolutism when we regulate the shit outta speech on a regular basis. We just dress it up. 🤷‍♀️

Show Post

I think there’s a very good reason to investigate this in the context of 230 reform: what triggers made this happen? Just because the First Amendment may protect the editorial decision to do this doesn’t mean that editorial decision should get a separate statutory immunity.

Show Post

Meanwhile in equine news, I'm happy to report that my donkey foot-soaking of past days seems to have sorted the (presumed) abscess and he's out enjoying a sunny pasture with the others. Glad not to have to continue with the oats-bribe & comical repositioning to get one leg into a bucket of warm H2O

Show Post

ah yes. should have said country … but yes, the state of US politics is so bad that it is possible to think it could happen in a US state

Show Post