jameswsthomson.com
Environment and climate journalist | Editor in Chief at @nationalobserver.com | Work in The Globe and Mail, The Narwhal, The Guardian | www.jameswsthomson.com
👤 Joined on 03 July 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@jwst.bsky.social@jwst.bsky.social → @jameswsthomson.comzapperfan7.bsky.social
kainagata.bsky.social
Not Found
worldbefree67.bsky.social
zurtok.bsky.social
Not Found
meowdelyn.bsky.social
Not Found
buffandtuff.com
kvlt.bsky.social
silent.bsky.social
fullykrausened.bsky.social
peanutbutterwhisky.bsky.social
joshallenfan2.bsky.social
friend0w0.bsky.social
sorblaze.northsky.social
sketchmaster.bsky.social
jugheadjonzz.bsky.social
granddad.bsky.social
dog.labeledrude.online
ariaofeffect.live
latent-emergence.myatproto.social
kesghidorah.bsky.social
victoriummactually.bsky.social
brie-skull-emoji.bsky.social
X has made a comeback with some communities, namely AI and tech, but it is not Twitter of old. On X, users have been spreading the name of a woman they think is Cornell's Jane Doe. One particular post doxed a woman's address and phone numbers and was viewed 1.4 million times.
Show PostOn X, users have circulated nonconsenual AI videos created by Grok of a woman they think is Jane Doe. They continue to spread her name. People have praised X for staying relevant for AI and tech conversation. But it also is the main vector for a doxing. That is X. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/16/n...
Show PostSeems relevant to that flood of journalists who in the last few weeks announced publicly that it was okay to return to X, that the platform had gotten better, and the worst aspects of it had been minimized. This is what you have endorsed.
Show Post