sintooth.bsky.social
LWMA, unterrified Tuckerite
👤 Joined on 10 February 2024
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@sintooth.bsky.socialcooluser354.bsky.social
penguins18.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
sagewood86.bsky.social
babadookspinoza.bsky.social
thecybersmith.bsky.social
cabezon.bsky.social
commiesamantha.bsky.social
demigirlboss.win
floridalaw.bsky.social
mikeginmd.bsky.social
dollspace.gay
jessefarrar.com
attie.ai
johnnylopezdenver.bsky.social
caquitadepato.bsky.social
whstancil.bsky.social
waxmonkey.bsky.social
manticorefalco.bsky.social
testyourmettle.bsky.social
jalli1315.bsky.social
thestarhart.bsky.social
joehaydu.bsky.social
cbowers.bsky.social
Someone looking wildly "older" is probably extremely unhealthy in various ways there's not much they can do over. In this study the research participants were all cancer patients. Someone who is 30 but looks like they're 50 is in a really bad state full stop.
Show PostYeah specifically if they look 20 years older than they actually are, they have a good chance of dying in the next 3 months. But that's equivalent to saying "people who look like they're dying are dying". Someone looking much rougher than they should for their age isn't just "aging".
Show PostIt's the kind of thing that nutcase billionaire is trying to biohack through blood transfusions and so on with limited evidence in many cases that fucking with your measurements will stop you dying.
Show PostThroughout the article it uses the term "biological age" which the photos are supposedly measuring as if it's a standardised clinical measure that there's some agreement on, rather than a cluster of different competing measurements from assorted quacks that actually say different things about health
Show Post