Tominaga K. (tomiken)

Tominaga K. (tomiken)

pacyc184.bsky.social

Microorganisms and Viruses in the ocean https://sites.google.com/view/kentotominaga/

👤 Joined on 02 September 2024

316

Followers

0

Following

2846

Total Posts

📜 Kullanıcı Geçmişi

  • 02 Eyl 2024, 00:52
    🎉 Bluesky'e katıldı - İlk kullanıcı adı: @pacyc184.bsky.social

🚫 Blokladığı Kullanıcılar

❤️ Beğendiği Gönderiler

forterre
16 September 2025 03:11

The phylogeny in figure S1 shows clearly that the rare rubulins in Asgard and Bacteria have been obtained from proto-eukaryotes. In my last mlife paper, I document extensive LGT between Asgard and proto-euka, even for univerdal proteins.

Show Post

This is a cool study, just wanted to highlight that the problem its solving isn't low abundance directly. Say your microbe of interest has real abundance of 0.5% & 29% GC. Our analysis shows that the abundance in Illumina reads might be as low as 0.025% due to bias. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

Show Post

Side note: One often thinks they're not recovering low-abundance taxa because they're low-abundance. But with Illumina, it's also likely because they're low-GC and Illumina has strong GC bias. You can fix this with wetlab intervention like this, or using ONT instead, which doesn't have a GC-bias.🧵

Show Post

Does ONT completely solve all metagenomics problems, no. But not having a GC bias helps a lot. At least in our hands, we recovered a lot more low-GC taxa with ONT than Illumina. And what's "most abundant" in our Illumina vs ONT reads aren't even similar...the differences always corresponding to GC.

Show Post

GC-bias also hugely distorts one's view of what is "abundant" in the first place. Nothing with low-GC will almost ever come up as abundant in Illumina because of intrinsic GC bias. Unless you did microscopy counts first, you never knew what was truly abundant.

Show Post

Select language

Install App

Install App