stanleyfriend.bsky.social
he/him
👤 Joined on 26 February 2024
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@stanleyfriend.bsky.socialctxpotato.bsky.social
disheveledyoshi.bsky.social
helitzur.bsky.social
martianmcfly.bsky.social
mike10010100.com
Not Found
hraedon.com
jackq.bsky.social
hourlybreezing.ntw.app
nowbreezing.ntw.app
vituperativeerb.bsky.social
onbluskysku.bsky.social
hrryan.bsky.social
like this is what drives me nuts about moderation on large platforms. content like this does require context to recognize it as hate speech. but an automated system is going to skip right over obvious hate speech like this bc it doesn't recognize "🐒" can be used as such. so the nazis go unpunished.
Show Postidk i believe portraying a flag of a minority group going into the trash is a pretty obvious example of hate speech, even in a vacuum... and tbh i do expect them to know, or at least attempt to find out, the context for this kind of stuff because it's relevant and necessary to the job.
Show PostEmotionally charged is such a pathetic weasel phrase
Show Post“emotionally charged audience” so now you’re blaming people because you allow others to insult, harass and threathen us and we have feelings about it ok, it’s clear where you stand, with the transphobes.
Show PostIf the policy is contentious then no amount of explaining will make it not contentious. If your goal is to assuage everyone's feelings so that on one will have anything negative to say back to you then yes it is *obviously* futile.
Show Post