Je déteste Gérard Larcher autant que n'importe qui, mais est-ce qu'on peut quand même éviter les blagues grossophobes à son encontre ? Elles ont un défaut : elles sont grossophobes.

Show Post

it really does feel like they just got away with unprecedented amount of theft of expertise, and are now profiting off of it while replacing the professional opportunities for the very crafts and humans it trained on I never thought I would see the concept of expertise get so devalued

Show Post

One solution: normalize desk-rejections. After a fast first assessment, papers are either desk-rejected, or go to full review. The current conf peer-review system has desk rejects as the exception, as it relied on self-selection prior to submission and small numbers. Neither of these hold anymore.

Show Post

One of those rare cases where I encounter data that completely contradicts my own priors and my anecdotal lived experience... I don't know what to do about it! I'm stumped.

Show Post

Spending my Saturday satisfying my ICLR reciprocal reviewing duty, which means sifting through hundreds of pages of completely meaningless AI slop. What is my moral / professional obligation as a reviewer when faced with a meaningless AI-written submission?

Show Post