I've been noticing that “cross-sectional” has become shorthand for “methodologically weak” in (network) research, and often data being cross-sectional is treated as a methodological objection in itself. I took some time to put my thoughts down in writing. Pre-print: osf.io/preprints/ps... 🧵⬇️

Show Post

Psychometricians model networks. Here is a map of theirs. 1,952 scholars. Coauthorship and citation data. Find yourself: completely-different.mindstrata.ru How many hops away are you from Sacha or Denny? @sachaepskamp.bsky.social @pmetricsoc.bsky.social #PsychSciSky #PSYNETS2026 #IMPS2026

Show Post

Woof. @psychscience.bsky.social put @sachaepskamp.bsky.social's symposium in a room for 20 people and when 100 showed up, they kicked the overflow out. What a bummer. How do you give one of the biggest names in network modeling such a small room for a network symposium??

Show Post

Come join me at these sessions at #APS26BCN! 🌟 SIPS @ APS breakfast 🌟 SIPS at APS: Advances in Peer Review and Scholarly Publishing 🌟 Better, Together, Stronger: Big Team Science In Action More info on what, when, and where in the below thread 🧵👇

Show Post

Touring the Roman-era olive orchard in Ulldecona, Spain. This tree is estimated to be nearly 2,000 years old.

Show Post