Dan Chapman

chapmanresearch.bsky.social

26 January 2026 17:16

“We picked a bunch of papers at random and…wait for it…they didn’t follow our exact post-hoc rules for how science should be done. Can you believe it?!”

Dan Chapman

chapmanresearch.bsky.social

26 January 2026 17:16

it is the laziest kind of nit-pick scholarship done under the guise of rigor, so it isn’t surprising who tends to be on the author lists.

Dan Chapman

chapmanresearch.bsky.social

26 January 2026 16:56

I do not, and will not, ever understand the appeal of these metascience papers that basically reduce to: ‘scientists are inconsistent! Here’s our new checklist to fix it’. Have you proven the inconsistency is an actual problem? Have you set any kind of benchmark that is defensible? No, of course not

Kapalı içerik

Kapalı içerik