And when I review, I'm not deliberately going through and checking refs for "hallucinations", not uploading someone else's work to a putative "AI checker", etc. But if I want to follow up on a thing you cite as a basis for the work, I should be able to find it.

Show Post

I reviewed a paper whose authors lied* about citations (citing papers that don't exist, etc.). So I stopped reviewing and told the journal. Three other reviewers didn't comment on this. AE confirmed the wrong citations. Decision: major revision!!! * yes, likely AI, but authors claimed the work

Show Post

New paper out in @jevbio.bsky.social ! We show that adaptation that likely evolved in response to postglacial warming in rear-edge populations could improve the resilience of these populations to future warming, especially compared to populations in the rest of the range. doi.org/10.1093/jeb/...

Show Post

Happy to announce that Dr. Kate Ostevik's Lessons from California Floral Diversity is officially uploaded on our Youtube channel.

Show Post

There's something about creating a nice physical copy of an output that really helps with closure on a project. So worth it!

Show Post