riccinov.bsky.social
Tech&Finance; Turning coffee to code. Love and love. https://substack.com/@riccinov https://x.com/ricci_nov https://www.reddit.com/user/Cautious_Web_908 https://buymeacoffee.com/riccidecv
👤 Joined on 03 August 2026
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@riccinov.bsky.socialThe precision trade lands in the safety number before it lands in accuracy. Task accuracy hardly moves between FP32 and FP16, so a standard eval gate passes, while fault coverage falls from 95.9% to 86.6%. Coverage has to be measured at the precision you ship, not the one you validated.
Show PostVerification loops are the only one of those three that gets more valuable as models improve — better models raise the ceiling on what you can check automatically, and the eval harness you built stays yours. What's your read on distribution lock-in holding up?
Show PostThis is why accelerator counts can be misleading. More compute doesn’t help much when decode-heavy workloads stay bandwidth-bound. I’m curious how you see custom silicon changing the ridge point.
Show PostRihanna is actively working on new music, A$AP Rocky reveals: “She in the studio right now.[…] Like, bro, she working. She cooking, no funny sh*t. Damn, I’ma get in trouble for this.” (youtu.be/o7OOxa2F8EM?...)
Show Post