Antoine Bosselut

Antoine Bosselut

abosselut.bsky.social

Helping machines make sense of the world. Asst Prof @icepfl.bsky.social; Before: @stanfordnlp.bsky.social @uwnlp.bsky.social AI2 #NLProc #AI Website: https://atcbosselut.github.io/

👤 Joined on 17 November 2024

525

Followers

130

Following

62

Total Posts

📜 Kullanıcı Geçmişi

  • 17 Kas 2024, 15:12
    🎉 Bluesky'e katıldı - İlk kullanıcı adı: @abosselut.bsky.social

🚫 Blokladığı Kullanıcılar

❤️ Beğendiği Gönderiler

Huge shoutout to my amazing co-authors on Mixture of Cognitive Reasoners: @cndesabbata.bsky.social, @gretatuckute.bsky.social, @eric-zemingchen.bsky.social, @mschrimpf.bsky.social, and @abosselut.bsky.social! Link: cognitive-reasoners.epfl.ch Poster below👇

Show Post
Mete
13 April 2026 17:08

LLMs can retrieve knowledge — but can they connect it in *creative* ways to solve problems? Introducing CresOWLve 🦉, a new benchmark that evaluates creative problem-solving over real-world knowledge, using puzzles that require multiple creative thinking strategies.👇

Show Post
Mete
13 April 2026 17:08

These aren't your typical trivia questions. CresOWLve spans 34 knowledge domains — from Literature to Astronomy to Art — covering 2,061 carefully curated puzzles across more than 26 cultures. Solving them demands *connecting facts across domains in non-obvious ways* 🌍📚

Show Post
Mete
13 April 2026 17:08

And it's not just *what* you know — it's *how* you think. 72% of puzzles require lateral thinking. Many involve analogy-making, abstraction, metaphors, jokes, and puns. Most questions combine 2+ creative reasoning strategies.

Show Post
Mete
13 April 2026 17:08

LLM performance? 📉 Non-thinking models under 30% (with CoT), most thinking models under 60%. 📉 Models perform up to 17% worse on creative vs. factual questions. Crucially, models *can* retrieve the relevant facts — they just fail to form the creative connection between them.

Show Post

Select language

Install App

Install App