mrbraddock.bsky.social
egg artist, dog reader, avid lover
👤 Joined on 04 September 2024
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@mrbraddock.bsky.socialwhygena.bsky.social
malberrybush.bsky.social
foxovh.bsky.social
noodlenood.bsky.social
kokomiin.bsky.social
danimocles.bsky.social
umykwa.bsky.social
varleitt.bsky.social
padorumiko.bsky.social
okunashi.bsky.social
athenawyrm.bsky.social
cco00oo.bsky.social
aidoruhakase.bsky.social
aohelll.bsky.social
petsanimals.bsky.social
Not Found
laceslibgremlin.bsky.social
nyxmonroe.bsky.social
demonicnesquik.bsky.social
joannajet.com
patchdoesart.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
estupendoman.bsky.social
mamou7511.bsky.social
More to the point, it doesn't involve *actual* relatives of any kind. On the other hand, if you're banning *depictions* of activities just because they're illegal, police shows are in trouble.
Show PostTo clarify, I'm not defending the content, I find it icky, but censorship is a slippery slope and I dont really care what porn other people watch as long as everyone involved is consenting. All this bill will do is make life more dangerous for sex workers.
Show PostYikes, UK leading the way in moral panic legislation yet again. Can't wait to see what reactionaries will be banning 5 years from now.
Show PostFirst you ban the content that the majority of people find objectionable. Then the controls are in place. Then it becomes easy (for far right governments, for example) to ban a wide variety of things.
Show Postthat's literally the argument that was used to make homosexuality illegal. which is to say, it's profoundly stupid. animals are not capable of giving consent. that should be blindingly obvious. and it should be equally obvious that two consenting adults should be able to have fun on their own.
Show Post