xthnru.bsky.social
Romanophile Idiot | Ontologically Correct Uranodioningin | OSHA enthusiast | Butlerian Aspirant | Crazy Cat Lady | TRANS FUCKING RIGHTS | She/Her
👤 Joined on 30 July 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@xthnru.bsky.socialnumapompili.bsky.social
anotherkevin7.bsky.social
reploidhunter.bsky.social
uapfreely.bsky.social
designer4hasand.bsky.social
allisoncarlhall.bsky.social
soundwave187.bsky.social
daleyd.bsky.social
Not Found
karma-chaos.bsky.social
ewindisch.ontological.observer
trendtags.bsky.social
idoreyinutibe.bsky.social
oldkingsfan.bsky.social
alissaevenson.bsky.social
sebsincognito.bsky.social
echelaunch.bsky.social
jjax.bsky.social
nmaxch.bsky.social
aniket13.bsky.social
schoolpl.bsky.social
stup0r.bsky.social
rustyincbus.bsky.social
gianttacosalad.bsky.social
caseyabrams.bsky.social
The mechanism is often treating conservative white discomfort as a veto, while the support of people most affected by the policy is treated as automatic. That’s not coalition-building; it’s hierarchy disguised as pragmatism.
Show PostAgain, this isn’t a declaration about voting in any way. It’s a declaration that i am in opposition to anyone who chooses anti-solidarity, a declaration that anyone who does so has lost my trust to such a degree that they don’t get to know what I will do.
Show PostThis post isn’t making a point about voting, but people with pundit-brain can’t approach any idea w/o equating it to voting, and so they respond by demanding assurances about voting—to which I say those who offer no assurances will receive no assurances. Feel a fraction of the anxiety you cause.
Show PostIf you would try to win by abandoning trans people (or any targeted group) you can save this “we need to win” talk; there is no “we.” I am about solidarity, and you have chosen anti-solidarity. You are not any “we” I recognize. You are the enemy I’m trying to defeat. Beating you is how my “we” wins.
Show Post