Davedette

davedette.bsky.social

18 October 2026 04:03

Also, we just said that no law may abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens, that none may be deprived of liberty w/o process, and that none may be denied equal protection of the law. Then, immediately, we stated that the law provides that certain ppl have fewer privileges and lesser liberty

Davedette

davedette.bsky.social

18 October 2026 04:03

Either holding elected office is not a right, or you're incorrectly describing what a right is.

Davedette

davedette.bsky.social

18 October 2026 04:02

Ah, wonderful. Then we agree that rights may be abridged without process in a liberal democracy. And thus we agree that, conceptually, one might correctly say that in a liberal democracy fascists do not have rights.

Grizzled Shopkeep

grizzled-shopkeep.bsky.social

18 October 2026 04:01

Wait, I have a response: MAGA DID CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS TOO, yes it's as weak as it sounds, I suppose

Davedette

davedette.bsky.social

18 October 2026 03:54

If Trump still retained all his rights in 2024, as he did prior to attempting a coup, then he could not be deprived of them without due process of law. And there was no process. Thus, trump v. Anderson was correct.