ajstein.bsky.social
Agricultural economist, PhD. Curating and sharing research and evidence-based information on food, health, technology & sustainability. More about me: www.AJStein.de. Moderated private account. Posts + Likes ≠ endorsements. German: ajstein-de.bsky.social
👤 Joined on 31 October 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@ajstein.bsky.socialvynithofficial.bsky.social
nucifraga.bsky.social
margotsibley25.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
gpetrick.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
mudbikernl.bsky.social
harkonnen-nrw.bsky.social
zeldalover1238.bsky.social
thesammich.bsky.social
amandamitchell377.bsky.social
cleartxt.bsky.social
nurumzunerven.bsky.social
rummelhucke-aha.bsky.social
westlerderzeit.bsky.social
gamp79.bsky.social
feivl.bsky.social
klabauterbach.bsky.social
eckhardtmusic.bsky.social
mia150908.bsky.social
Oh, so you’re the one who wrote that drivel. Every single billionaire is a policy failure. Every single one. It isn’t arbitrary. It’s because it’s impossible to amass that much wealth without exploitation.
Show PostIncome inequality has exploded since the pandemic. Quibbling over "good billionaires" & "bad billionaires" is beyond silly. Tax them all heavily. It's past time.
Show PostLet me put the other argument, does any human being on the planet need 1000 million dollars? What would the world be like if wealth was capped at, say, 100 million dollars and everything over that went making the lives of everyone else on the planet better.
Show PostThe very existence of billionaires while people die from poverty is a policy failure as well as a moral failure for all of society. You cannot be a good person within that framework, period.
Show PostI like the FT even but this already completely fails on point of logic. What would be *in*discriminate about a very specific 10-digit fortune criterion and tiny demographic exactly? Are tax proposals for much larger demographics now also (logically) vastly more “indiscriminate” according to the FT?
Show Post