powerfuldave.online
Likes: Retro tech, animals, good music, politics, Trek, Dwarf, and restarting Who. Dislikes: Some root vegetables. You can be anything in this world, and it doesn't hurt to be kind. Awaiting the downfall of the Birdsite. Resident of Lowestoft
👤 Joined on 29 August 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@powerfuldave.bsky.social@powerfuldave.bsky.social → @powerfuldave.onlineelpobster.bsky.social
Not Found
cubbyspice.bsky.social
diaperedbrat26.bsky.social
brianbergstrom.bsky.social
daddylobovan.bsky.social
abe-q.bsky.social
xsyckes.bsky.social
gymbulge1.bsky.social
bonassetit.bsky.social
Not Found
hugemateria.bsky.social
ryaninpnw.bsky.social
Not Found
hairytallboy.bsky.social
latenightlunch.bsky.social
thckbub.bsky.social
Not Found
musclethong.bsky.social
realonmas.bsky.social
misscuriousjay.bsky.social
aularong.bsky.social
seattlebeefy.bsky.social
rossytv.bsky.social
polarbearbarian.bsky.social
No, this is not true. The claim that the BBC is legally prohibited from settling out of court is a misconception
Show PostWhy the Myth Exists This idea frequently circulates during high-profile legal battles—particularly when the BBC fights back against aggressive litigation rather than folding or issuing quick nuisance payouts. The confusion usually stems from a few real constraints:
Show PostFiduciary Duty and Public Funds: Because the BBC is funded by public licence fees and government-backed mechanisms, it is held to high standards of financial accountability. It cannot casually hand over public money without justification.
Show PostInstitutional Policy: The BBC has a robust corporate policy of fiercely defending journalism when it believes its reporting is accurate. Rather than settling weak or meritless claims out of convenience, they often choose to litigate to discourage frivolous lawsuits.
Show Post