vidocrazor.bsky.social
CG said I have to have a bio. Testifying expert: Information forensics, information security, OSINT. ABA published author. Maker of things: 3D printing, welding, fiberglass, smelting/casting, CNC, single board electronics and programming (python).
👤 Joined on 05 December 2024
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@vidocrazor.bsky.socialNot Found
elitegrifters.bsky.social
not--today--satan.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
xiaotongyang.bsky.social
Not Found
jessesingal.com
Not Found
misanthropicusa.bsky.social
switchbladeera.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
kgfla.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
If you are in a position to help your local food bank, please do. Non-perishables, canned foods, etc are always needed. We need to come together and fight this cruelty. @aoc.bsky.social @indivisible.org
Show PostIst natürlich Zufall, dass es darin insb. um Open Weight Modelle geht. Man kann das Papier auch als „reguliert Open Weight Modelle” Lobbyismus lesen um die Gewinne von OpenAI und Anthropic final zu sichern. Das ist nämlich, warum es bei dem ganzen Doomgerede der letzten Wochen geht.
Show PostIt's no longer niche. My company has it's own GLM-5.3 on own hardware being way cheaper than Anthropic/OpenAI. Token maxing is dead since summer since the first companies burned their complete 2026 AI budget moths ahead of deadline (even "accidentally" up to 500 million).
Show PostNow the companies do the normal stuff with open weight, switching models down to DeepSeek 4.1 Flash and only use the high price ones for very limited and dedicated work. So BigTech burned billions for now being at the dead end. Nobody could have seen that – except everyone with eyes and a brain.
Show PostBy the way – ever wondered, why the Anthropic paper is 99% about open weight models? Probably because it's just a bullshit lobby paper, to get the orange motherfucker to ban open weight and create a moat for the Big Tech fascists?
Show Post