reagen.bsky.social
No one of consequence Teepublic store: https://tee.pub/lic/hPz6CjO6Fjs
👤 Joined on 17 September 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@reagen.bsky.socialnickvern.bsky.social
mathempell.bsky.social
Not Found
dprktrainpusher42.bsky.social
cheflubu.bsky.social
foxydonuts.bsky.social
timpranillo.bsky.social
snorecardgage.bsky.social
siberionhusky.bsky.social
cybertruckh8r.bsky.social
foulharbor.bsky.social
doctorsoup64.bsky.social
thelunchador.bsky.social
service-worker.bsky.social
fucklandlords.com
samuraicop69.bsky.social
zapd117.bsky.social
kildog.bsky.social
tayl1r.itch.io
coryinatx.bsky.social
twotimesjohnny.bsky.social
beansnbops.bsky.social
fuzzymike.bsky.social
thevelcrostrap.bsky.social
opossumopie.bsky.social
And so it makes sense that people think "hey, once I get past this immediately binding financial pressure, things will be fine". And that's just not generally true - you just move on to the next binding constraint.
Show PostThere's a lot of research on "tunnelling" in finanical behaviors - where people narrowly focus on a specific next step instead of the broader picture. ascend.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/u...
Show PostI do think that it makes sense that people *think* it will, though.
Show PostWell I'd focus on removing the deviations on the lower side, so it might amount to about the same thing as raising the bottom median. My thoughts are it will require tackling the top deviations though. I dont need absolute equality, i just want care to be focused on the lowest rungs
Show PostGalaxy Brain proposal: PLQ-PCQ-QS grand coalition to do one and exactly one thing. End FPTP
Show Post