It doesn’t answer anything. It is just… this

Show Post

A great example! if you simply ignore the actually existing project is decades of increasingly deranged dehumanisation and destruction of a subject populace, then it becomes quite easy to treat it as a vague, liberal sounding aspiration. It is IMO very clear why pundits do this.

Show Post

In writing this I read all of Paul Ovenden's opinion pieces for The Times, which were eerily similar to this:

Show Post

Which is in a sense funny because it then accelerates that collapse further by rendering the question of Palestine through a free speech prism thus incentivizing people to associate being pro-Palestine with being pro free speech.

Show Post

Hard to describe this as anything other than an elite-level psychosis spurred on by the collapse of mainstream support for Israel.

Show Post