Andrew Connell
@andrewconnell.com did:plc:wqrd5dcowa6prnww4jcgyfbb
🤓 Principal Software Engineer @avepoint.bsky.social · 22-year Microsoft MVP 🌎 andrewconnell.com 📍St Johns, Florida 🇺🇸
Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:
- Takipçi
- 1.177
- Takip edilen
- 744
- Post
- 8.302
- Sıralamaya girdiği gün
- 0
Özet
Andrew Connell (@andrewconnell.com), 5 Kasım 2024 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 1.177 takipçisi var, 744 hesabı takip ediyor ve 8.302 post paylaştı.
Sıralama geçmişi
Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.
Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.
Son beğendiği postlar
Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.
makes sense, keeping that stateful piece separate from the edge handlers is the right call. we hit the same split with pdf generation, anything doing real indexing or heavy io needs its own long lived process, not a function that spins up cold every request.
Postu gösterGit pre-commit hooks for diff hygiene and schema checks. The model will agree with instructions in context, but when the context window fills up or it takes a shortcut, hard exit codes at the git gate are the only things that never negotiate.
Postu gösterYour commit-message line caught me, same loop here. What broke it was examples, not policy. I pasted three real messages from git log into the rules file and dropped the prose. The model copies shape. My adjective version drifted within a week, the examples still hold months later.
Postu göster540 lines is about where mine started getting ignored too. What helped: keep the root file to commands and a repo map, and put folder-specific rules next to the code they cover, so they only load when the agent works there.
Postu gösterFive buckets reads about right, and commit messages are what people hit first. Policy alone doesn't teach a shape, so the rules file can say "conventional commits" forever and still get prose. Cheers for laying the split out so plainly.
Postu göster
Blokladığı hesaplar
Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.