@seppholzinger.bsky.social did:plc:tlsnlughzxtl7wutzb7mxt4w
Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:
- Takipçi
- 1
- Takip edilen
- 1
- Post
- 44
- Sıralamaya girdiği gün
- 0
Özet
(@seppholzinger.bsky.social), 29 Ekim 2025 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 1 takipçisi var, 1 hesabı takip ediyor ve 44 post paylaştı.
Sıralama geçmişi
Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.
Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.
Son beğendiği postlar
Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.
Fand ich mit Abstand den schlechtesten Text, den ich in letzter Zeit gelesen habe. Er agiert nur mit ein paar Buzzwords, bedient Ideologien, aber sicher keine wirklichen Konzepte, produziert nichts weiter als heisse Luft. Pädagogik-Quacksalberei.
Postu gösterI now also read this paper. It is a basic summary of Poppers work I agree with, but treating our paper as an example of an inductive approach would require actively misrepresenting what we state. So I really fail to see your point here. Unless there is any stronger argument from your side.
Postu gösterDo the typical scholarly thing: rephrase our point in the strongest way possible, explain where you agree, then say where we are wrong, and point out what is needed to improve the sentence. I am happy to replace a few words.
Postu gösterYou have picked out a single sentence and made some point about it. I never find this useful. If this is not semantics, you can tie it back to main points in the paper. As you have not done this, it is difficult to engage meaningfully with your message.
Postu gösterMaybe you can rephrase the sentence so it is correct. That will clarify the extent of your criticism. If it is semantics, as I expect, or something we need to think about.
Postu göster
Blokladığı hesaplar
Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.
Bu hesap kimseyi bloklamıyor.