Ir para o conteúdo

@sharrowhater.bsky.social did:plc:z5i6jbj2wx542gavadg7xtde

Every thing I say is in my personal capacity and not from my employer.

No Bluesky desde

Seguidores
799
Seguindo
1.036
Posts
6.857
Dias nos rankings
0

Resumo

(@sharrowhater.bsky.social) é um usuário do Bluesky desde 4 agosto 2025. Tem 799 seguidores, segue 1.036 contas e publicou 6.857 posts.

Aparições nos rankings

Os melhores dias em que posts desta conta entraram na lista diária do Debya.

Esta conta ainda não apareceu em um ranking diário.

Posts curtidos recentemente

Curtidas públicas da rede Bluesky.

  • Alex O. Diaz@alexodiaz.bsky.social

    Why Texas Republicans blew all 2024 gains with Latino Voters. 1. Racial profiling from Trump immigration enforcement 2. Greg Abbott deputized police to act immigration agents. 3. Its the economy, stupid! The CA Prop 187 backlash lead to a slow decline in CAGOP. TXGOP speedran their decline!

    Ver post
  • Micah@rincewind.run

    going to have to get really aggressive about blocking rude quote posts if I don’t want to lose what’s left of my mind, this traffic surge is A Lot

    Ver post
  • Dare Obasanjo@carnage4life.bsky.social

    No it isn’t.

    Ver post
  • Peter Liepmann@datadrivenfp.bsky.social

    It's very simple. The Democratic Congress passes a bill that has wide popular support like Medicare for All. Trump loses whether he vetoes it (massively unpopular act) or signs it, giving the Democrats a massive win. Same strategy as putting a poison pill in a must-pass bill. It's lose/lose for him.

    Ver post
  • David Roberts@volts.wtf

    I do not understand the purported significance of the phrase "dare Trump to veto it." He'll just veto it. Why would he so much as hesitate? What is the implied threat even supposed to be? What incentive is there -- *from Trump's perspective* -- to give a hostile Dem Congress a big leg victory?

    Ver post

Entre para ver mais

Contas que bloqueia

No Bluesky, bloqueios são registros públicos.