Mike Kaiser
@scoop113.bsky.social did:plc:nsdyrcjqaugjzsbklokphd4w
Prematurely and involuntarily retired ink-stained wretch.
No Bluesky desde
- Seguidores
- 32
- Seguindo
- 27
- Posts
- 328
- Dias nos rankings
- 0
Resumo
Mike Kaiser (@scoop113.bsky.social) é um usuário do Bluesky desde 22 março 2024. Tem 32 seguidores, segue 27 contas e publicou 328 posts.
Aparições nos rankings
Os melhores dias em que posts desta conta entraram na lista diária do Debya.
Esta conta ainda não apareceu em um ranking diário.
Posts curtidos recentemente
Curtidas públicas da rede Bluesky.
Funny thing is I think the Fifth actually got it right here. 230 does 2 things: it says you can't be treated as the publisher of user generated content and you have immunity for moderation. Neither has any application to the claims against Salesforce (they're not based on publishing or moderation)
Ver post- cowboyinbrla.bsky.social@cowboyinbrla.bsky.social
And any response that essentially says "But look at all these other times they were wrong" misses the point entirely.
Ver post - cowboyinbrla.bsky.social@cowboyinbrla.bsky.social
I agree the 5th is a mess. And the attack on Mike's position may well have been ill-informed and ungrounded, and I respect Mike's work in this area immensely. I still think the 5th got it right *this time*, because I don't see how anyone could say Salesforce is entitled to Section 230 immunity.
Ver post - cowboyinbrla.bsky.social@cowboyinbrla.bsky.social
I don't think any of us question the notion that the 5th Circuit is often on the fringes and gets overturned even by this SCOTUS. That doesn't mean every decision of theirs is incorrect. And again, it did not hold Salesforce liable for anything. It simply denied it S230 immunity.
Ver post He just failed to employ the sarcasm font.
Ver post
Contas que bloqueia
No Bluesky, bloqueios são registros públicos.
Esta conta não bloqueia ninguém.