John Sands

@iohn.bsky.social did:plc:imbkxipogmxuv7kyrpv7dklv

information•society•cats Opinions my own

No Bluesky desde 10 abril 2023

Resumo

John Sands (@iohn.bsky.social) é um usuário do Bluesky desde 10 abril 2023. Tem 1.358 seguidores, segue 1.114 contas e publicou 393 posts.

Os melhores dias em que posts desta conta entraram na lista diária do Debya.

Esta conta ainda não apareceu em um ranking diário.

Curtidas públicas da rede Bluesky.

David Harvey@topladave.bsky.social27/10/2026 14:17
It is thought just 10 individual vaquitas, a type of porpoise and the smallest of all cetaceans, remain in the Gulf Of California. www.iflscience.com/loosening-fi...
Ver post
Breaking Mews/Ruff Translations@breakingmews.bsky.social27/10/2026 02:10
Mondays are hard. Would a cat help?
Ver post
Tressie McMillan Cottom@tressiemcphd.bsky.social26/10/2026 18:36
(Gen Ai autocorrect is epistemic violence of the highest order, btw. Grrr. Let’s pretend all my typos are a radical resistance strategy and not just me being too tired to fix it. Kthx.)
Ver post
Tressie McMillan Cottom@tressiemcphd.bsky.social26/10/2026 18:36
Monopoly power and politics of code means Gen Ai makes the user legible without ever becoming legible to the user. (In fact thats AI’s entire value proposition — make know without being known.) Literacy cannot overcome that kind of architecture of secrecy.
Ver post
Tressie McMillan Cottom@tressiemcphd.bsky.social26/10/2026 18:35
Thank you for being such a team player here to a genuine helpful question. it really makes my life a little bit easier. It makes me feel like we’re gonna win. To the Q: literacy presumes that the system wants to be legible to the user. Gen ai doesn’t intend to be legible.
Ver post

No Bluesky, bloqueios são registros públicos.