Aller au contenu
debya
Français
Se connecter Inscription gratuite
Voir sur Bluesky Suivre ce compte

badPuppy

@badpuppy1492.bsky.social did:plc:rombd6dkhw3uuzswitsq5ir5

“Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it” “You have a right to your own opinion but not a right to your own facts” "Free speech does not include disinformation/misinformation" Proud father, nerd, science, democracy, love is love. 🚫MAGA

Sur Bluesky depuis le

Abonnés
9 690
Abonnements
9 856
Posts
6 217
Jours dans les classements
0

Résumé

badPuppy (@badpuppy1492.bsky.social) est sur Bluesky depuis le 13 novembre 2024. Le compte a 9 690 abonnés, suit 9 856 comptes et a publié 6 217 posts.

Présence dans les classements

Les meilleurs jours où les posts de ce compte sont entrés dans le top quotidien de Debya.

Ce compte n’est encore apparu dans aucun classement quotidien.

Posts aimés récemment

J’aime publics du réseau Bluesky.

  • Adam Klasfeld@klasfeldreports.com

    Trump DOJ runs scared from Jack Smith. Citing regs concerning "current or former employees," DOJ tries to block BBC from deposing Smith about Trump and Jan. 6. Smith agreed to testify. It cites grand jury secrecy, classified info privilege, exec privilege & more. Doc buff.ly/bssIUTC

    Voir le post
  • Allison Gill@muellershewrote.com

    Hang on a second. Did DOJ just say Jack Smith was appointed properly and is therefore a former federal employee? Doesn’t that cut against their whole argument for tossing the documents case - that he wasn’t a proper DOJ employee because he wasn’t senate-confirmed?

    Voir le post
  • Norm Eisen@normeisen.bsky.social

    Of every backdrop in Washington, Trump picked the reflecting pool for his closing midterm pitch The project his team botched, redid on our $16M dime & then blamed on an innocent man, Davey Hearn Why close in front of your own do-over? I had a few thoughts on the ridiculousness @ms.now👇 -TN

    Voir le post
  • Charles GetCovered-ba 🏥 ✡️@charlesgaba.com

    Note: After the events of yesterday, I actually think Abdul will win by 4. Haley’s actions seem to have massively backfired even on a basic electoral impact level & instead have rallied those still reluctant to support Abdul to vote for him if only as a shock response to her.

    Voir le post
  • MB@sugarcubedog.bsky.social

    Doesn’t the SCOTUS decision in CA override this?

    Voir le post

Connectez-vous pour en voir plus

Comptes bloqués

Sur Bluesky, les blocages sont publics.