Saltar al contenido

Plough Lane By Numbers

@ploughlanebynum.bsky.social did:plc:omx4v2g3briai455h3mzzo24

AFC Wimbledon blog, stats and opinions by Tim Hanson

En Bluesky desde el

Seguidores
204
Siguiendo
81
Posts
688
Días en rankings
0

Resumen

Plough Lane By Numbers (@ploughlanebynum.bsky.social) es un usuario de Bluesky que se unió el 13 noviembre 2024. Tiene 204 seguidores, sigue a 81 cuentas y ha publicado 688 posts.

Apariciones en rankings

Los mejores días en que los posts de esta cuenta entraron en la lista diaria de Debya.

Esta cuenta aún no ha aparecido en un ranking diario.

Posts que le gustaron recientemente

Me gusta públicos de la red Bluesky.

  • Eddiefourbyes@eddiefourbyes.bsky.social

    Btw in interest of disclosure I’m still on the fence, leaning no. I actually like the financial terms and structure (with some concerns which I’d only resolve with access to the legal docs) and could live with their strategy but I am very concerned about the backer, things don’t add up.

    Ver post
  • Eddiefourbyes@eddiefourbyes.bsky.social

    Not read the full proposal yet but this echoes two of my key concerns 1) what is the financial situation/model of the club when the equity payments stop coming in? 2) when one party owns 90% economics but does not fully control there WILL be at some point a fundamental disagreement. What happens?

    Ver post
  • Eddiefourbyes@eddiefourbyes.bsky.social

    Excellent as always. I share the concern that Stockley, good as he is, forces a style of play which is 1) not great to watch, 2) leaves us nothing when he isn’t on the pitch 3) is only really likely to win you games 1-0 when we aren’t exactly watertight at the back atm.

    Ver post
  • Nath@thisisnath.bsky.social

    🟦 18th 🟥 Oxford United dabble with a double relegation 🟨 Ogundere, I think he’ll be cemented as our best defender by the end of the season 🟩 Jake Richards. Looked different class against us in April and he’s only 19.

    Ver post
  • Eddiefourbyes@eddiefourbyes.bsky.social

    Saw Mick Buckley’s statement saying that club has over budgeted based on a SURVEY of who would invest in a new Plough Lane bond. Sorry but that is the dummest fucking thing I have ever heard. Sounds like something someone organising a stag would do, not a multi million pund commercial operation.

    Ver post

Inicia sesión para ver más

Cuentas que bloquea

En Bluesky los bloqueos son registros públicos.

Esta cuenta no bloquea a nadie.