Zum Inhalt springen

Stop tRumpnado

@stoptnado.bsky.social did:plc:v4cbq4547odnt5onuh3j6qj7

anti insurrectionist • opposing the convicted felon on the other app with @Trumpnado2016 since 2015 • https://www.threads.net/@stoptnado • https://twitter.com/Trumpnado2016

Bei Bluesky seit

Follower
544
Folgt
373
Posts
935
Tage in Ranglisten
0

Zusammenfassung

Stop tRumpnado (@stoptnado.bsky.social) ist seit 11 Oktober 2023 auf Bluesky. Das Konto hat 544 Follower, folgt 373 Konten und hat 935 Posts veröffentlicht.

Ranglisten-Platzierungen

Die besten Tage, an denen Posts dieses Kontos in Debyas Tagesliste kamen.

Dieses Konto war noch in keiner Tagesrangliste.

Zuletzt gelikte Posts

Öffentliche Likes aus dem Bluesky-Netzwerk.

  • Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

    Ultimately, with other limitations in other cases, and the reality that everything is already going on, I don’t expect this — either way — to have much practical difference today. I think this was a very important TRO on Friday when issued to prevent any big efforts, but now we’re in voting.

    Post anzeigen
  • Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

    This was a draw from hell, and I wonder if they hold another vote for the actual full court to consider this truly en banc, then grant that and vacate the limited en banc order, keeping the TRO in effect at least through today.

    Post anzeigen
  • Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

    Because the Ninth Circuit is so big (29 active judges), its limited en banc procedure is the chief judge and 10 randomly selected judges. 5 of the 10 judges selected, beyond Murguia (the chief judge), are Trump appointees. They and Bea (GWB) are the six judges in the majority.

    Post anzeigen
  • Gail@rowls.bsky.social

    Every time he stands at a podium he shows the entire world how utterly clueless he is to the realities of life. By letting him to continue to do this shows how little they respect they have for him.

    Post anzeigen
  • Gabriel Malor@gabrielmalor.bsky.social

    Not a stretch to believe there need not be a literal interpretation of Rule 3(c)(1)(C) in this circumstance. But, bottom line, this is a ridiculous sideshow of DOJ's own making. They have templates for notices of appeal. Why they didn't use one, I do not know.

    Post anzeigen

Melde dich an, um mehr zu sehen

Blockierte Konten

Blockierungen sind auf Bluesky öffentlich.