chaosking1236.bsky.social

@chaosking1236.bsky.social did:plc:ryxttsnblvnkuzepz6byxwlo

Bei Bluesky seit 30 November 2023

Follower: 1.040
Folgt: 73
Posts: 79
Tage in Ranglisten: 0

Zusammenfassung

chaosking1236.bsky.social (@chaosking1236.bsky.social) ist seit 30 November 2023 auf Bluesky. Das Konto hat 1.040 Follower, folgt 73 Konten und hat 79 Posts veröffentlicht.

Ranglisten-Platzierungen

Die besten Tage, an denen Posts dieses Kontos in Debyas Tagesliste kamen.

Dieses Konto war noch in keiner Tagesrangliste.

Zuletzt gelikte Posts

Öffentliche Likes aus dem Bluesky-Netzwerk.

Dan Neidle@danneidle.bsky.social07.11.2026 18:26
I usually investigate tax. But I also care deeply about how the legal system can be used to silence people - not least because others have tried to use it to silence us. Our free newsletter: buff.ly/ASbkiUG
Post anzeigen
Dan Neidle@danneidle.bsky.social07.11.2026 18:26
Our full report is here, including a complete copy of the injunction (minus the Confidential Schedule) and three appeal documents. buff.ly/gJxf13H
Post anzeigen
Dan Neidle@danneidle.bsky.social07.11.2026 18:26
Then the scary question: Was this a one-off? Or have other injunctions been granted, supposedly to prevent harassment, but actually silencing people - even in private conversations with friends, family and the police? I don't know if there's any way to find out.
Post anzeigen
Dan Neidle@danneidle.bsky.social07.11.2026 18:26
And for the judiciary: how could a judge grant such an order against an unrepresented defendant, without a trial, without determining whether her allegations were true and without, it seems, any assessment of proportionality?
Post anzeigen
Dan Neidle@danneidle.bsky.social07.11.2026 18:25
How could lawyers justify asking a court to prohibit speech that couldn't conceivably constitute harassment - including private conversations with friends and family, and reports to the police?
Post anzeigen

Melde dich an, um mehr zu sehen

Blockierte Konten

Blockierungen sind auf Bluesky öffentlich.