Zum Inhalt springen

scott b. weingart

@scottbot.net did:plc:c5pgebskvz35wxtkopm7osm5

past: circus performer; historian of science; librarian; grantmaker; chief data & evaluation officer at NEH. present: dad; resident scholar at dartmouth; chief technology officer at the library of virginia. personal account. https://scottbot.github.io

Bei Bluesky seit

Follower
4.184
Folgt
1.642
Posts
59
Tage in Ranglisten
0

Zusammenfassung

scott b. weingart (@scottbot.net) ist seit 24 Mai 2023 auf Bluesky. Das Konto hat 4.184 Follower, folgt 1.642 Konten und hat 59 Posts veröffentlicht.

Ranglisten-Platzierungen

Die besten Tage, an denen Posts dieses Kontos in Debyas Tagesliste kamen.

Dieses Konto war noch in keiner Tagesrangliste.

Zuletzt gelikte Posts

Öffentliche Likes aus dem Bluesky-Netzwerk.

  • Molly Jeffery, PhD MPP@mollyjeffery.bsky.social

    I'm very worried about the quality of notes and the quality of clinical reasoning in the next generation of trainees. I believe AI-assisted notes are poisoning the training data and any progress currently being made is a dead end.

    Post anzeigen
  • Molly Jeffery, PhD MPP@mollyjeffery.bsky.social

    research properly--never learning to do their own lit review or to critically read the literature, in particular. The models out there produce biased results when you ask for a list of sources. And frankly, I never consented for my work to train models to make Sam Altman money.

    Post anzeigen
  • Molly Jeffery, PhD MPP@mollyjeffery.bsky.social

    We're in very different fields, it looks like (though there is a Scott Weingart in my field!). I think this probably differs by field. In my field, most people are juggling research and clinical practice, so they have a lot of time pressure. I am very worried about residents never learning how to do

    Post anzeigen
  • Molly Jeffery, PhD MPP@mollyjeffery.bsky.social

    That's the stance I've arrived at from experience with people who have asked me to coauthor who use a lot of AI. I am in a field (acad med) where people are under a lot of pressure to publish a lot. I'm tired of catching people in lies about the extent of their use or their checking of LLM output.

    Post anzeigen
  • Rebecca Colesworthy@rcolesworthy.bsky.social

    Someone else noted that when they upload mss to Lightning Source they’re required to check if AI has been used in the creation of a manuscript and they have no idea what happens if you do check that box. The answer is always “no,” but also…is it? Really? Every time? Errrr…

    Post anzeigen

Melde dich an, um mehr zu sehen

Blockierte Konten

Blockierungen sind auf Bluesky öffentlich.