CCL Raritan Valley
@cclraritan.bsky.social did:plc:rwfrhrhqylcqaj5uhoxf74jd
Raritan Valley, NJ chapter of Citizens' Climate Lobby, an international climate action organization. We are nonpartisan and support big-effective, large-scale solutions at all levels of government.
Joined Bluesky on
- Followers
- 82
- Following
- 25
- Posts
- 799
- Days on leaderboards
- 0
Summary
CCL Raritan Valley (@cclraritan.bsky.social) is a Bluesky user who joined on 3 January 2025. They have 82 followers, follow 25 accounts and have published 799 posts.
Leaderboard appearances
Best days this account’s posts made Debya’s daily top list.
This account hasn’t appeared on a daily leaderboard yet.
Recently liked posts
Public likes from the Bluesky network.
➡️ cclusa.org/baaja-house
Show postRhodium Group's analyses are central to how we discuss emissions forecasts in this country, so what the consultancy found on the permitting reform bill was going to be closely watched. Very cool that @emilypont.bsky.social and @robinsonmeyer.bsky.social got it first :) heatmap.news/energy/rhodi...
Show post... wisdom still councils taking the deal that's on the table today, just in case. Unrestrained Dems would be able to roll back whatever changes they didn't like in today's bill. (I would warn, though, that even an unrestrained Dem majority is unlikely to jam throug a clean-only bill.)
Show postTo summarize, the *best* version of the "better deal later" case involves 3 additional years of the status quo permitting regime (which favors fossil fuels!) followed by a series of total Dem triumphs, a unanimous vote agains the filibuster, & a choice to spend political capital on permitting.
Show postOK, well what about 2028? Say the Dems win the presidency & majorities in both houses. They'd still need 60 votes in the Senate & still couldn't get them for a clean-only bill. What if they a) win a trifecta, b) kill the filibuster, & c) prioritize permitting over dozens of other urgent things?
Show post
Accounts they block
Bluesky blocks are public records.