Not cynical, but blinkered. You admit Christianity succeeded which you attribute to “businesslike worldliness” and “great marketing techniques”. Its success was also due to some "package of ideas” but those ideas are never explored, which is a shame because I think it misses the bigger picture...

Show Post

I would call *anyone* who misrepresented a detailed and careful critique in the way she has both pathetic and snivelling. That has zero to do with her gender. So “a women no less”? What? Women get a free pass on lying and patent misrepresentation? And the fact she’s an academic makes it far worse.

Show Post

… anyone can contrast it with her ludicrous caricature of it in her snivelling above. historyforatheists.com/2025/10/revi...

Show Post

… based misgivings about her new book early last year. She has failed to engage with a single point in my lengthy and carefully referenced review, resorting to pathetic misrepresentation and that truly feeble “misogyny” insinuation. What a sad individual she is. Here is the actual review - …

Show Post

What a load of nonsense. Anyone who reads my review can see I go into great detail about the arguments of the book, so to claim it’s just “slinging mud” and “ad hominem” is patently ridiculous. And I do neither of those things anyway. And she blocked me years ago, not after I expressed soundly …

Show Post