Saltar al contenido

Freelance Scientist

@docjon.bsky.social did:plc:bhaipo7gm77fvoahprtdbcmv

Scientist 🏳️‍🌈

En Bluesky desde el

Seguidores
433
Siguiendo
676
Posts
47
Días en rankings
0

Resumen

Freelance Scientist (@docjon.bsky.social) es un usuario de Bluesky que se unió el 23 julio 2023. Tiene 433 seguidores, sigue a 676 cuentas y ha publicado 47 posts.

Apariciones en rankings

Los mejores días en que los posts de esta cuenta entraron en la lista diaria de Debya.

Esta cuenta aún no ha aparecido en un ranking diario.

Posts que le gustaron recientemente

Me gusta públicos de la red Bluesky.

  • Eh@thechanchanman.bsky.social

    Done. Fuck this shit

    Ver post
  • Mark Hamill@markhamillofficial.bsky.social

    47's closing argument was deeply compelling: Pro-Iran War, Ballroom, Triumphal Arch, Helipad, Luxury Golf Course, Reflecting Pool, Obtain Greenland, not being laughed at, etc. Don Jr's was even stronger: "They want to make Ohio a state!" I agonized over my decision, but ultimately, voted all BLUE.🗳️

    Ver post
  • Eh@thechanchanman.bsky.social

    Every time I saw a guy bend over and spread his hole, I can't help but think about how wild monkeys do the same thing.

    Ver post
  • Bottles@bottles1936.bsky.social

    How many people have received police disclosures without realising that apparently continuous passages may contain concealed gaps? How many complaints, investigations or legal challenges might have been affected? And has this technique ever influenced material relied upon in criminal proceedings?

    Ver post
  • Bottles@bottles1936.bsky.social

    Lets be clear: Police cant simply make up the law and expect the public to eat it. Lawful redaction protects information that genuinely must be withheld. Invisible redaction can conceal the very fact that information has been removed at all. Those are fundamentally different things.

    Ver post

Inicia sesión para ver más

Cuentas que bloquea

En Bluesky los bloqueos son registros públicos.