Michael Anderson
michaelander45.bsky.social
Attorney, Views are my own and not intended as legal advice 😁
👤 Joined on 06 October 2023
2717
Followers
1590
Following
18158
Total Posts
📜 Kullanıcı Geçmişi
- 06 Eki 2023, 18:06
🎉 Bluesky'e katıldı - İlk kullanıcı adı:
@michaelander45.bsky.social - 09 Kas 2023, 18:37
🔄 Profil bilgileri güncellendi
🚫 Blokladığı Kullanıcılar
did:plc:ttoh2nlhfx333dpotzitfytf
Not Found
did:plc:32slziwz6kggvb3hy3eqykl2
Not Found
They Call Me the Night Demon of Sicily
nightdemonofsicily.bsky.social
Copy that
goforproduction.bsky.social
Jess
jesscamnj.bsky.social
dj vulcan barbie
spacedaddy.bsky.social
Homeland Security
homelandgove.bsky.social
did:plc:ploshrb3rmrae6w7adjhpj2h
Not Found
Cupid's Molotov
cupidsmolotov.bsky.social
Noah Milligan
milligannoah.bsky.social
Jason S
jasonswritings.bsky.social
Austin Butlerian Jihad 🇵🇸
huckstergon.bsky.social
MemesBeDreams (he/him)
memesbedreams.bsky.social
Trump Country
libsaltminer.bsky.social
Brianna Wu
brianna.bsky.social
The Anarchist Twin
9foxgambit.bsky.social
did:plc:hpd2bu2kkamvbdtig3eautq2
Not Found
❤️ Beğendiği Gönderiler
And importantly, yeah, Congress is different. No one disputes that, for example, Congress *could* revoke section 230 and nuke the open Internet as we know it, and investigating how tech companies are using that editorial shield is obviously within their legislative remit
Show Post
right, like asking meta if they were being pressured by the government is absolutely not an infringement of speech!
Show Post
Do Meta's decisions here have input into legitimate concerns and inquiries that Congress might have? Seems like it's perfectly fine under existing case law unless you'd like to pull up precedent against it.
Show Post
He's performing liberal pluralism in a way that is extremely good and important
Show Post