Seeing this already in journals, AI-written lit reviews citing sources that don't exist, now getting labeled research misconduct instead of just sloppy work. Skipping the step of reading sources is the real problem.

Show Post

Here's an article about exactly the dynamics in the OP if useful: > Courses offered by Radboud In’to Languages on learning to write using chatbots do not meet academic standards and undermine the work of academics, according to a professor and an associate professor of Artificial Intelligence.

Show Post

"Honesty is a core value in the Dutch Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity. Using generative AI to supposedly make a text more authentic – which is what the course aims to do – clearly conflicts with that value." — @irisvanrooij.bsky.social

Show Post

It's good to see a code that follows research from design all the way through peer review, instead of only judging the finished paper. That kind of care is what keeps trust in the work intact 🙂

Show Post

the people who benefit from injustice have great motive to believe that there is no alternative to accepting and complying with it the rest of us don't though

Show Post