Stephen Wild

Stephen Wild

stephenjwild.bsky.social

I try to put straight lines through things but usually fail. Try to be Bayesian when I can. Views my own. RT/like != endorsement.

👤 Joined on 07 mayo 2023

3994

Followers

1154

Following

1357

Total Posts

📜 Kullanıcı Geçmişi

  • 07 May 2023, 01:10
    🎉 Bluesky'e katıldı - İlk kullanıcı adı: @stephenjwild.bsky.social
  • 13 Kas 2023, 02:40
    🔄 Profil bilgileri güncellendi

🚫 Blokladığı Kullanıcılar

❤️ Beğendiği Gönderiler

We also shouldn’t find ourselves surprised there are so few experts who are strongly in the camp of “meta caused harm”. Good luck when your quasi experimental approach hits reviewers whose SUTVA violating withdrawal experiments found nada. Faculty gig? It went to the former meta employee.

Show Post

Up top I should say meta and industry funded. Please do read that paper if you feel mad about this thread.. it’s a dynamic that is the problem not personal choices and virtue.

Show Post

So no, meta isn’t paying you to say the jury is out on their products but consistent career support (fellowships, internships, grants) isn’t offered to people whose methods find harm. How does that shape the way in which we understand their products?

Show Post

Of course you can guess where this is going… the drugs increased rates of death. The researchers weren’t corrupt and many with industry funding were involved in correcting the record. Nevertheless the industrial bias got a lot of people killed.

Show Post

Measuring arrhythmia surpresion rather than cardiac death became the norm across researchers with and without funding from industry. The drugs were commonly prescribed to ostensibly reduce risk of death.

Show Post

Seleccione el idioma