egrattan.bsky.social
mother, daughter, sister, friend, foe, also, i write and talk on the radio. ElizabethGrattan.com radioelizabeth.com
👤 Joined on 07 octubre 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@egrattan.bsky.socialamericanparty.bsky.social
blueribbonpac.bsky.social
jacklaridian.bsky.social
keepupthe.bsky.social
boudicaqueen.bsky.social
kelowna777.bsky.social
sagastar.bsky.social
eugenehetzel.bsky.social
kevinkleinpdx.bsky.social
faerydoor.bsky.social
advantage87.bsky.social
clusterfuck.bsky.social
cmnotesandviations.bsky.social
pitchbot.bsky.social
americanrebels.bsky.social
urban-achiever.bsky.social
nospineoroathright.bsky.social
pupperoni.bsky.social
beyerstein.bsky.social
photoman1.bsky.social
barely67.bsky.social
ajr60.bsky.social
skywatcher1600.bsky.social
witmemo.bsky.social
b9cc1d.bsky.social
And an *extra* Happy Halloween to the houses that give out shots to other parents as we walk by.
Show PostWell first we'd have to start enforcing the foreign emoluments clause at all. But I recall discussing this with maybe @hurricanexyz.bsky.social and my read of the clause is it speaks of "accept" while "holding" a US office. Doesn't seem to limit titles etc. you've already accepted pre-officeholding.
Show PostNow THAT’s the paper I would read.
Show PostI don't think it's worth worrying about and not sure I agree even on the merits. More interesting: would a statute to that effect be constitutional? Can you single out a particular category of citizen who's ineligible to vote like that? Does applying it to the pope in particular raise 1A problems?
Show PostThe Pope, as the sovereign of a foreign state, should/should not have the right to vote in the United States. I would read that paper.
Show Post